Distance learning provides instructional experiences no matter
where you are or when you are able to study.
When I first considered distance learning, my impression was that it was
cohort-based with text materials used dominantly to guide learning. This initial understanding discouraged me
from pursuing learning or employment via this new setting.
When I served public schools as a brick-and-mortar teacher
and administrator, my understanding of distance learning included online
experiences that could be applied in a traditional classroom. I did not learn to appreciate distance
learning until I was offered an administrative position with a virtual
school. The more I learned, the more I
realized that distance and online learning encompasses so much more than what
the public initially assumes.
First, I learned that virtual instruction includes both
synchronous and asynchronous instruction and interaction. I observed and evaluated online teachers, who
implemented effective instructional strategies that are not possible in a
traditional setting, such as: application and document sharing, polling,
simultaneous chat (without distractions), and also gauged student participation
and actively encouraged every student to be part of the class. Then I saw recorded lessons, which could be
used at any time and any place. The
asynchronous component is flexible around the schedules of students, families,
and instructors. Many lessons have the
potential to be self-scoring, grade books allow students to quickly see their
progress, and feedback from teachers is specific and timely.
While my friends and colleagues embraced online learning for
themselves as they pursued graduate degrees, I was more reluctant and completed
my first Masters at a brick-and-mortar.
However, seeing firsthand how online learning was presented for students
in a Kinder-12th grade virtual school provided me with a more
accepting definition of distance learning and I decided to enroll in Walden University.
Walden provides mostly asynchronous instruction, which
accommodates my busy schedule and allows me to review certain lessons multiple
times. This experience has shown me an
even more flexible side to distance learning.
Mike Simonson defines distance learning as, “formal
education in which the learning group (teacher, student, resources) are
separated by geography and sometimes time.”
I agree with Simonson’s definition. Prior to this Distance Learning course, I
thought that distance learning was a relatively new concept. However, the Distance Learning Timeline
Continuum shows that distance learning actually has its roots in the
1800s. Correspondence learning, learning
by mail, was perhaps the first time individuals were provided with a formal
education primarily at home. In the early
1900s, lessons were even provided via radio.
Our modern interpretation of distance learning generally includes the
use of a computer and the internet. As
technology advances, so does the delivery of distance learning.
Throughout Huett, Moller, and Foshay’s work, they describe
the challenges faced by online schools such as stigma, however as online
schools spread like wildfire this stigma has reduced. In some situations, I have even heard students
and families state that online learning is more engaging and useful than the
traditional approach. I also agree with Simonson
in that online learning will not replace traditional settings, however will
continue to become more widely used, accepted, and respected.
Distance learning has shifted from learn-by-mail to
learn-via-internet over the past century.
The technology tools we use to implement distance learning only continue
to improve and evolve and the instruction that accompanies it follows
suit. I cannot even imaging what
distance learning will be in another hundred or two hundred years. However, the image of the librarian from H.G.
Wells’ Time Machine comes to mind. Distance
learning will continue to improve and more learners will become convinced of
its merit.

References
Huett,
J., Moller, L., Foshay, W., & Coleman, C. (2008). The evolution of distance
education: Implications
for instructional design on the potential of the web (Part 3: K12). TechTrends,
52(5), 63–6 7.
Moller,
L., Foshay, W., & Huett, J. (2008). The evolution of distance education:
Implications for
instructional design on the potential of the web (Part 1: Training and
development). TechTrends,
52(3), 70–75.
Moller,
L., Foshay, W., & Huett, J. (2008). The evolution of distance education:
Implications for
instructional design on the potential of the web (Part 2: Higher
education). TechTrends, 52(4), 66-
70.
Simonson,
M., Smaldino, S., Albright, M., & Zvacek, S. (2012). Teaching and
learning at a distance:
Foundations of distance education (5th ed.) Boston, MA: Pearson.
(pp.32-41)
No comments:
Post a Comment